Monday, October 03, 2005

Official Business

I've removed my Supreme Court campaign picture and withdrawn myself from consideration. There's just no way I can compete with a woman named Harriet. But I have to say President Bush has got some big Texas balls to choose someone with 'no judicial experience.' I guess that's as close to me as he could get. LOL


Kristi said...

I was hoping for you Rae Ann. Harriet. Please. She's quite the enigma right now. I've heard she's donated to many democratic campaigns and Harry Reid loves her. President Bush must be hitting the rock pretty hard lately.

Assorted Babble by Suzie said...

You know RaeAnn you were my first choice...always have been, however for once so far I totally agree with Eddie and his analysis. Additionally, I feel I just do not know enough yet about her to lean one way or the other. Still listening to new info as it is revealed.

That is funny about that NAME though HARRIET!!! (LOL) Good point following too....(LOL)

Rae Ann said...

kristi, I do like that she's a 'non-judge'. I need to learn more about her.

suzie, I just read Eddie's post. It was good.

Kevin said...

Keep in mind that our last chief justice had no judicial experience, as didn't White and about 15 other prominant and effective members of said body.

It can be good, or it can be bad. My biggest fear is her agenda. (whatever that winds up being)