Tuesday, April 11, 2006

"No Representation Without Taxation"

Yes, that's the inverse of the famous slogan from our REVOLUTIONARY WAR,

"NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION."

Does anyone remember our American History? Does anyone remember why we fought for INDEPENDENCE from England? I'm not going to review that here because it should be COMMON KNOWLEDGE.

But I'm so mad about all the ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION bullshit that I'm spitting venom.

They sneak into our country illegally, leaving huge, litter-strewn trails along the borders, trespassing on TAX-PAYING AMERICANS' property. And now just because they 'peacefully' demonstrate on our streets they think they have a RIGHT to citizenship and 'respect.'

SORRY! I have no respect for someone who comes here and expects to have all the same rights as a LEGAL resident without going through the proper processes.

I see them as no different from a MOB OF BULLIES who think that they are above the law. They are just like that selfish person who tries to jump ahead of others when there is a long line at the bank or whatever. We're all in line here, folks. It is NOT the American Way to cave to a mob of criminals.

If our Congress gives in to the demands of the ILLEGALS then we all should

VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE BECAUSE THEY OBVIOUSLY ARE NOT REPRESENTING THEIR TRUE CONSTITUENTS, REAL AMERICAN CITIZENS.


Article Three, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in
levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them
aid and comfort
. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the
testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open
court."



Well, I'm sure many will object to my calling ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS our 'enemies', but they are AN INVADING FOREIGN FORCE, and if that's not an enemy then what is??


I have no qualms about accusing any US CONGRESSMEN of TREASON if they are "adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort," which certainly seems the case if they are putting ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS' demands ABOVE their CONSTITUENTS', American Citizens, needs.

Call me mean-spirited, non-compassionate, whatever. I don't care. MY TAXES pay the salaries of my so-called REPRESENTATIVES, and if they aren't doing their job then they need to at least be fired, if not convicted of aiding criminals.

8 comments:

mr_g said...

I totally agree with your theory. IN practice, I think it means saying that if there is enough of a need for these folks to be here, change the laws and make them legal. Otherwise illegal is illegal...there's no getting past that.

Rae Ann said...

Well, the problem with all that wishy-washy talk about how much they do for the economy, etc. is that it doesn't really address the issues of why people need to follow the laws. If there is that much of a need for them to be here then there should be that much of an incentive for them to become legal in the proper ways. Just giving them citizenship just because they walk in the street with a flag smacks in the face all the people who have gone through the proper channels. It sends the message that you can break the laws but if enough people parade in the streets about it then they should be forgiven. It's just wrong.

Assorted Babble by Suzie said...

I have been watching this unfold from the beginning. Each time I find myself getting more and more angry. I have no respect for these people that crossed our borders illegally. How dare them protest and be so flamboyant. Some said "We are Sick and Tired" & "We deserve Respect" Blah, Blah, Blah. I'm stunned by the ones...agreeing with them. This issue is not all about ones wanting to work and pay taxes. That is crap!! There are many other reasons...not portraited in the MSM.

I feel like you about these law-makers....I will NOT be voting for any of them that support giving these people a free pass. You make so many valid points.
I linked you again for my today's post. Not sure if you have been watching the debates lately on this, but it adds to the BP some more. Check out the Mexican Constitution.

Mahndisa S. Rigmaiden said...

04 12 06

Hey Rae Ann:
You broke this down like no other. And what you have said makes tons of sense to me! Miss Suzie did a comprehensive post on the topic today and it really gets my blood boiling. I still don't understand how these moonbats fight for the rights of people who really have no rights!!! Pure silliness. What is our country coming to?

Anonymous said...

You have your US HISTORY Wrong...the quote is.."No taxation without representation". Maybe you could try a little harder before the venom slurs out your mouth. Good to see that your passionate about it I suppose, but you need to focus on the resolution and not the issue. Everyone has there own opinion on how to resolve this issue. Stop talking and act.

- An American tired of lazyness

Rae Ann said...

Well, hello anonymous dummy! Did you NOT even read my post where I SPECIFIED that my title is the INVERSE OF THE FAMOUS QUOTE???

Apparently not, as it was very clearly stated! Instead of leaving dumb anonymous comments calling people wrong and lazy MAYBE YOU SHOULD INCREASE YOUR OWN EFFORT IN ACTUALLY READING A POST BEFORE SPEAKING!!!!

DUH! Now who looks lazy and isn't trying hard enough?????

Oh, boy! I just love when people like you make comments that are ridiculous and obviously uninformed. Learn to read!! As for 'resolutions' I proposed that our so-called representatives be held accountable to the real tax paying citizens or face charges of treason or at least losing their jobs.

-An American tired of stupid anonymous comments by people who don't actually read and comprehend a post

Anonymous said...

If a blog demeaning people is the proper action, and typing out how the representatives should be held accountable, then by all means your doing a fantastic job! Keep up the good work and lets keep the "stupid, non-comprehending, uninformed, ridiculous, lazy, dummies" in their place. Take'em out one by one tiger.

Rae Ann said...

Okay, Mr./Ms. South Carolina, I only engage in a complementary amount of demeaning speech as what I receive from anonymous commentors like yourself. I suppose you've personally got all the immigration issues under control there in South Carolina, or do you just pick on people who write blogs?